Contributing happens via "Pull requests" (PR) on github. Every PR needs to be reviewed before it can be merged and the Continuous Integration should be green.
The PR has to be approved by two core developers or by Araq.
Writing tests
There are 4 types of tests:
- runnableExamples documentation comment tests, ran by nim doc mymod.nim These end up in documentation and ensure documentation stays in sync with code.
- separate test files, e.g.: tests/stdlib/tos.nim. In nim repo, testament (see below) runs all $nim/tests/*/t*.nim test files; for nimble packages, see https://github.com/nim-lang/nimble#tests.
- (deprecated) tests in when isMainModule: block, ran by nim r mymod.nim. nimble test can run those in nimble packages when specified in a task "test".
- (not preferred) .. code-block:: nim RST snippets; these should only be used in rst sources, in nim sources runnableExamples should now always be preferred to those for several reasons (cleaner syntax, syntax highlights, batched testing, and parameter rdoccmd allows customization).
Not all the tests follow the convention here, feel free to change the ones that don't. Always leave the code cleaner than you found it.
Stdlib
Each stdlib module (anything under lib/, e.g. lib/pure/os.nim) should preferably have a corresponding separate test file, e.g. tests/stdlib/tos.nim. The old convention was to add a when isMainModule: block in the source file, which only gets executed when the tester is building the file.
Each test should be in a separate block: statement, such that each has its own scope. Use boolean conditions and doAssert for the testing by itself, don't rely on echo statements or similar; in particular, avoid things like echo "done". Don't use unittest.suite and unittest.test.
Sample test:
block: # foo doAssert foo(1) == 10 block: # bug #1234 static: doAssert 1+1 == 2 block: # bug #1235 var seq2D = newSeqWith(4, newSeq[bool](2)) seq2D[0][0] = true seq2D[1][0] = true seq2D[0][1] = true doAssert seq2D == @[@[true, true], @[true, false], @[false, false], @[false, false]] # doAssert with `not` can now be done as follows: doAssert not (1 == 2)
Always refer to a GitHub issue using the following exact syntax: bug #1234 as shown above, so that it's consistent and easier to search or for tooling. Some browser extensions (e.g. https://github.com/sindresorhus/refined-github) will even turn those in clickable links when it works.
Rationale for using a separate test file instead of when isMainModule: block:
- allows custom compiler flags or testing options (see details below)
- faster CI since they can be joined in megatest (combined into a single test)
- avoids making the parser do un-necessary work when a source file is merely imported
- avoids mixing source and test code when reporting line of code statistics or code coverage
Compiler
The tests for the compiler use a testing tool called testament. They are all located in tests/ (e.g.: tests/destructor/tdestructor3.nim). Each test has its own file. All test files are prefixed with t. If you want to create a file for import into another test only, use the prefix m.
At the beginning of every test is the expected behavior of the test. Possible keys are:
- cmd: A compilation command template e.g. nim $target --threads:on $options $file
- output: The expected output (stdout + stderr), most likely via echo
- exitcode: Exit code of the test (via exit(number))
- errormsg: The expected compiler error message
- file: The file the errormsg was produced at
- line: The line the errormsg was produced at
For a full spec, see here: testament/specs.nim
An example of a test:
discard """ errormsg: "type mismatch: got (PTest)" """ type PTest = ref object proc test(x: PTest, y: int) = nil var buf: PTest buf.test()
Running tests
You can run the tests with
./koch tests
which will run a good subset of tests. Some tests may fail. If you only want to see the output of failing tests, go for
./koch tests --failing all
You can also run only a single category of tests. A category is a subdirectory in the tests/ directory. There are a couple of special categories; for a list of these, see testament/categories.nim, at the bottom.
./koch tests c lib # compiles / runs stdlib modules, including `isMainModule` tests ./koch tests c megatest # runs a set of tests that can be combined into 1
To run a single test:
./koch test run <category>/<name> # e.g.: tuples/ttuples_issues ./koch test run tests/stdlib/tos.nim # can also provide relative path
For reproducible tests (to reproduce an environment more similar to the one run by Continuous Integration on github actions/azure pipelines), you may want to disable your local configuration (e.g. in ~/.config/nim/nim.cfg) which may affect some tests; this can also be achieved by using export XDG_CONFIG_HOME=pathtoAlternateConfig before running ./koch commands.
Comparing tests
Test failures can be grepped using Failure:.
The tester can compare two test runs. First, you need to create a reference test. You'll also need to the commit id, because that's what the tester needs to know in order to compare the two.
git checkout devel DEVEL_COMMIT=$(git rev-parse HEAD) ./koch tests
Then switch over to your changes and run the tester again.
git checkout your-changes ./koch tests
Then you can ask the tester to create a testresults.html which will tell you if any new tests passed/failed.
./koch tests --print html $DEVEL_COMMIT
Deprecation
Backward compatibility is important, so instead of a rename you need to deprecate the old name and introduce a new name:
# for routines (proc/template/macro/iterator) and types: proc oldProc(a: int, b: float): bool {.deprecated: "deprecated since v1.2.3; use `newImpl: string -> int` instead".} = discard # for (const/var/let/fields) the msg is not yet supported: const Foo {.deprecated.} = 1 # for enum types, you can deprecate the type or some elements # (likewise with object types and their fields): type Bar {.deprecated.} = enum bar0, bar1 type Barz = enum baz0, baz1 {.deprecated.}, baz2
See also Deprecated pragma in the manual.
Documentation
When contributing new procs, be sure to add documentation, especially if the proc is public. Even private procs benefit from documentation and can be viewed using nim doc --docInternal foo.nim. Documentation begins on the line following the proc definition, and is prefixed by ## on each line.
Runnable code examples are also encouraged, to show typical behavior with a few test cases (typically 1 to 3 assert statements, depending on complexity). These runnableExamples are automatically run by nim doc mymodule.nim as well as testament and guarantee they stay in sync.
proc addBar*(a: string): string = ## Adds "Bar" to `a`. runnableExamples: assert "baz".addBar == "bazBar" result = a & "Bar"
See parentDir example.
The RestructuredText Nim uses has a special syntax for including code snippets embedded in documentation; these are not run by nim doc and therefore are not guaranteed to stay in sync, so runnableExamples is almost always preferred:
proc someProc*(): string = ## Returns "something" ## ## .. code-block:: ## echo someProc() # "something" result = "something" # single-hash comments do not produce documentation
The .. code-block:: nim followed by a newline and an indentation instructs the nim doc command to produce syntax-highlighted example code with the documentation (.. code-block:: is sufficient from inside a nim module).
When forward declaration is used, the documentation should be included with the first appearance of the proc.
proc hello*(): string ## Put documentation here proc nothing() = discard proc hello*(): string = ## ignore this echo "hello"
The preferred documentation style is to begin with a capital letter and use the third-person singular. That is, between:
proc hello*(): string = ## Returns "hello" result = "hello"
or
proc hello*(): string = ## say hello result = "hello"
the first is preferred.
When you specify an RST role (highlighting/interpretation marker) do it in the postfix form for uniformity, that is after `text in backticks`. For example an :idx: role for referencing a topic ("SQLite" in the example below) from Nim Index can be used in doc comment this way:
## A higher level `SQLite`:idx: database wrapper.Inline monospaced text can be input using `single backticks` or ``double backticks``. The former are syntactically highlighted, the latter are not. To avoid accidental highlighting follow this rule in *.nim files:
use single backticks for fragments of code in Nim and other programming languages, including identifiers, in *.nim files.
For languages other than Nim add a role after final backtick, e.g. for C++ inline highlighting:
`#include <stdio.h>`:cpp:
For a currently unsupported language add the :code: role, like for SQL in this example:
`SELECT * FROM <table_name>;`:code:
Highlight shell commands by :cmd: role; for command line options use :option: role, e.g.: `--docInternal`:option:.
- prefer double backticks otherwise:
- for file names: ``os.nim``
- for fragments of strings not enclosed by " and " and not related to code, e.g. text of compiler messages
- also when code ends with a standalone \ (otherwise a combination of \ and a final ` would get escaped)
*.rst files have :literal: as their default role. So for them the rule above is only applicable if the :nim: role is set up manually as the default [*]:
.. role:: nim(code) :language: nim .. default-role:: nim
The first 2 lines are for other RST implementations, including Github one.
Best practices
Note: these are general guidelines, not hard rules; there are always exceptions. Code reviews can just point to a specific section here to save time and propagate best practices.
New defined(foo) symbols need to be prefixed by the nimble package name, or by nim for symbols in nim sources (e.g. compiler, standard library). This is to avoid name conflicts across packages.
# if in nim sources when defined(allocStats): discard # bad, can cause conflicts when defined(nimAllocStats): discard # preferred # if in a package `cligen`: when defined(debug): discard # bad, can cause conflicts when defined(cligenDebug): discard # preferred
Take advantage of no implicit bool conversion
doAssert isValid() == true doAssert isValid() # preferred
Design with method call syntax chaining in mind
proc foo(cond: bool, lines: seq[string]) # bad proc foo(lines: seq[string], cond: bool) # preferred # can be called as: `getLines().foo(false)`
Use exceptions (including assert / doAssert) instead of quit rationale: https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/4089
quit() # bad in almost all cases doAssert() # preferred
Use doAssert (or unittest.check, unittest.require), not assert in all tests so they'll be enabled even with --assertions:off.
block: # foo assert foo() # bad doAssert foo() # preferred
An exception to the above rule is runnableExamples and code-block rst blocks intended to be used as runnableExamples, which for brevity use assert instead of doAssert. Note that nim doc -d:danger main won't pass -d:danger to the runnableExamples, but nim doc --doccmd:-d:danger main would, and so would the second example below:
runnableExamples: doAssert foo() # bad assert foo() # preferred runnableExamples("-d:danger"): doAssert foo() # `assert` would be disabled here, so `doAssert` makes more sense
Delegate printing to caller: return string instead of calling echo rationale: it's more flexible (e.g. allows the caller to call custom printing, including prepending location info, writing to log files, etc).
proc foo() = echo "bar" # bad proc foo(): string = "bar" # preferred (usually)
[Ongoing debate] Consider using Option instead of return bool + var argument, unless stack allocation is needed (e.g. for efficiency).
proc foo(a: var Bar): bool proc foo(): Option[Bar]
Tests (including in testament) should always prefer assertions over echo, except when that's not possible. It's more precise, easier for readers and maintainers to where expected values refer to. See for example https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/9335 and https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/4089
echo foo() # adds a line for testament in `output:` block inside `discard`. doAssert foo() == [1, 2] # preferred, except when not possible to do so.
The git stuff
General commit rules
- Important, critical bugfixes that have a tiny chance of breaking somebody's code should be backported to the latest stable release branch (currently 1.4.x) and maybe also all the way back to the 1.0.x branch. The commit message should contain the tag [backport] for "backport to the latest stable release" and the tag [backport:$VERSION] for backporting back to the given $VERSION (and all newer releases).
- If you introduce changes which affect backward compatibility, make breaking changes, or have PR which is tagged as [feature], the changes should be mentioned in the changelog.
All changes introduced by the commit (diff lines) must be related to the subject of the commit.
If you change something unrelated to the subject parts of the file, because your editor reformatted automatically the code or whatever different reason, this should be excluded from the commit.
Tip: Never commit everything as is using git commit -a, but review carefully your changes with git add -p.
Changes should not introduce any trailing whitespace.
Always check your changes for whitespace errors using git diff --check or add the following pre-commit hook:
#!/bin/sh git diff --check --cached || exit $?
Describe your commit and use your common sense. Example commit message:
Fixes #123; refs #124
indicates that issue #123 is completely fixed (GitHub may automatically close it when the PR is committed), wheres issue #124 is referenced (e.g.: partially fixed) and won't close the issue when committed.
- PR body (not just PR title) should contain references to fixed/referenced github issues, e.g.: fix #123 or refs #123. This is so that you get proper cross referencing from linked issue to the PR (github won't make those links with just PR title, and commit messages aren't always sufficient to ensure that, e.g. can't be changed after a PR is merged).
Commits should be always be rebased against devel (so a fast forward merge can happen)
e.g.: use git pull --rebase origin devel. This is to avoid messing up git history. Exceptions should be very rare: when rebase gives too many conflicts, simply squash all commits using the script shown in https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/9356
- Do not mix pure formatting changes (e.g. whitespace changes, nimpretty) or automated changes (e.g. nimfix) with other code changes: these should be in separate commits (and the merge on GitHub should not squash these into 1).
Continuous Integration (CI)
- Continuous Integration is by default run on every push in a PR; this clogs the CI pipeline and affects other PR's; if you don't need it (e.g. for WIP or documentation only changes), add [skip ci] to your commit message title. This convention is supported by our github actions pipelines and our azure pipeline (using custom logic, which should complete in < 1mn) as well as our former other pipelines: Appveyor and Travis.
- Consider enabling CI (azure, GitHub actions and builds.sr.ht) in your own Nim fork, and waiting for CI to be green in that fork (fixing bugs as needed) before opening your PR in the original Nim repo, so as to reduce CI congestion. Same applies for updates on a PR: you can test commits on a separate private branch before updating the main PR.
Debugging CI failures, flaky tests, etc
- First check the CI logs and search for FAIL to find why CI failed; if the failure seems related to your PR, try to fix the code instead of restarting CI.
- If CI failure seems unrelated to your PR, it could be caused by a flaky test. File a bug for it if it isn't already reported. A PR push (or opening/closing PR) will re-trigger all CI jobs (even successful ones, which can be wasteful). Instead, follow these instructions to only restart the jobs that failed:
- Azure: if on your own fork, it's possible from inside azure console (e.g. dev.azure.com/username/username/_build/results?buildId=1430&view=results) via rerun failed jobs on top. If either on you own fork or in Nim repo, it's possible from inside GitHub UI under checks tab, see https://github.com/timotheecour/Nim/issues/211#issuecomment-629751569
- GitHub actions: under "Checks" tab, click "Re-run jobs" in the right.
- builds.sr.ht: create a sourcehut account so you can restart a PR job as illustrated. builds.sr.ht also allows you to ssh to a CI machine which can help a lot for debugging issues, see docs in https://man.sr.ht/builds.sr.ht/build-ssh.md and https://drewdevault.com/2019/08/19/Introducing-shell-access-for-builds.html; see https://man.sr.ht/tutorials/set-up-account-and-git.md to generate and upload ssh keys.
Code reviews
- Whenever possible, use GitHub's new 'Suggested change' in code reviews, which saves time explaining the change or applying it; see also https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/4317
- When reviewing large diffs that may involve code moving around, GitHub's interface doesn't help much as it doesn't highlight moves. Instead, you can use something like this, see visual results here:
git fetch origin pull/10431/head && git checkout FETCH_HEAD git diff --color-moved-ws=allow-indentation-change --color-moved=blocks HEAD^
- In addition, you can view GitHub-like diffs locally to identify what was changed within a code block using diff-highlight or diff-so-fancy, e.g.:
# put this in ~/.gitconfig: [core] pager = "diff-so-fancy | less -R" # or: use: `diff-highlight`
Documentation Style
General Guidelines
- See also nep1 which should probably be merged here.
- Authors should document anything that is exported; documentation for private procs can be useful too (visible via nim doc --docInternal foo.nim).
- Within documentation, a period (.) should follow each sentence (or sentence fragment) in a comment block. The documentation may be limited to one sentence fragment, but if multiple sentences are within the documentation, each sentence after the first should be complete and in present tense.
- Documentation is parsed as a custom ReStructuredText (RST) with partial markdown support.
- In nim sources, prefer single backticks to double backticks since it's simpler and nim doc supports it. Likewise with rst files: nim rst2html will render those as monospace, and adding .. default-role:: code to an rst file will also make those render as monospace when rendered directly in tools such as github.
- (debatable) In nim sources, for links, prefer [link text](link.html) to `link text<link.html>`_ since the syntax is simpler and markdown is more common (likewise, nim rst2html also supports it in rst files).
proc someproc*(s: string, foo: int) = ## Use single backticks for inline code, e.g.: `s` or `someExpr(true)`. ## Use a backlash to follow with alphanumeric char: `int8`\s are great.
Module-level documentation
Documentation of a module is placed at the top of the module itself. Each line of documentation begins with double hashes (##). Sometimes ##[ multiline docs containing code ]## is preferable, see lib/pure/times.nim. Code samples are encouraged, and should follow the general RST syntax:
## The `universe` module computes the answer to life, the universe, and everything. ## ## .. code-block:: ## doAssert computeAnswerString() == 42
Within this top-level comment, you can indicate the authorship and copyright of the code, which will be featured in the produced documentation.
## This is the best module ever. It provides answers to everything! ## ## :Author: Steve McQueen ## :Copyright: 1965 ##
Leave a space between the last line of top-level documentation and the beginning of Nim code (the imports, etc.).
Procs, Templates, Macros, Converters, and Iterators
The documentation of a procedure should begin with a capital letter and should be in present tense. Variables referenced in the documentation should be surrounded by single tick marks:
proc example1*(x: int) = ## Prints the value of `x`. echo x
Whenever an example of usage would be helpful to the user, you should include one within the documentation in RST format as below.
proc addThree*(x, y, z: int8): int = ## Adds three `int8` values, treating them as unsigned and ## truncating the result. ## ## .. code-block:: ## # things that aren't suitable for a `runnableExamples` go in code-block: ## echo execCmdEx("git pull") ## drawOnScreen() runnableExamples: # `runnableExamples` is usually preferred to ``code-block``, when possible. doAssert addThree(3, 125, 6) == -122 result = x +% y +% z
The command nim doc will then correctly syntax highlight the Nim code within the documentation.
Types
Exported types should also be documented. This documentation can also contain code samples, but those are better placed with the functions to which they refer.
type NamedQueue*[T] = object ## Provides a linked data structure with names ## throughout. It is named for convenience. I'm making ## this comment long to show how you can, too. name*: string ## The name of the item val*: T ## Its value next*: ref NamedQueue[T] ## The next item in the queue
You have some flexibility when placing the documentation:
type NamedQueue*[T] = object ## Provides a linked data structure with names ## throughout. It is named for convenience. I'm making ## this comment long to show how you can, too. name*: string ## The name of the item val*: T ## Its value next*: ref NamedQueue[T] ## The next item in the queue
Make sure to place the documentation beside or within the object.
type ## Bad: this documentation disappears because it annotates the `type` keyword ## above, not `NamedQueue`. NamedQueue*[T] = object name*: string ## This becomes the main documentation for the object, which ## is not what we want. val*: T ## Its value next*: ref NamedQueue[T] ## The next item in the queue
Var, Let, and Const
When declaring module-wide constants and values, documentation is encouraged. The placement of doc comments is similar to the type sections.
const X* = 42 ## An awesome number. SpreadArray* = [ [1,2,3], [2,3,1], [3,1,2], ] ## Doc comment for `SpreadArray`.
Placement of comments in other areas is usually allowed, but will not become part of the documentation output and should therefore be prefaced by a single hash (#).
const BadMathVals* = [ 3.14, # pi 2.72, # e 0.58, # gamma ] ## A bunch of badly rounded values.
Nim supports Unicode in comments, so the above can be replaced with the following:
const BadMathVals* = [ 3.14, # π 2.72, # e 0.58, # γ ] ## A bunch of badly rounded values (including π!).
Evolving the stdlib
As outlined in https://github.com/nim-lang/RFCs/issues/173 there are a couple of guidelines about what should go into the stdlib, what should be added and what eventually should be removed.
What the compiler itself needs must be part of the stdlib
Maybe in the future the compiler itself can depend on Nimble packages but for the time being, we strive to have zero dependencies in the compiler as the compiler is the root of the bootstrapping process and is also used to build Nimble.
Vocabulary types must be part of the stdlib
These are types most packages need to agree on for better interoperability, for example Option[T]. This rule also covers the existing collections like Table, CountTable etc. "Sorted" containers based on a tree-like data structure are still missing and should be added.
Time handling, especially the Time type are also covered by this rule.
Existing, battle-tested modules stay
Reason: There is no benefit in moving them around just to fullfill some design fashion as in "Nim's core MUST BE SMALL". If you don't like an existing module, don't import it. If a compilation target (e.g. JS) cannot support a module, document this limitation.
This covers modules like os, osproc, strscans, strutils, strformat, etc.
Syntactic helpers can start as experimental stdlib modules
Reason: Generally speaking as external dependencies they are not exposed to enough users so that we can see if the shortcuts provide enough benefit or not. Many programmers avoid external dependencies, even moreso for "tiny syntactic improvements". However, this is only true for really good syntactic improvements that have the potential to clean up other parts of the Nim library substantially. If in doubt, new stdlib modules should start as external, successful Nimble packages.
Other new stdlib modules do not start as stdlib modules
As we strive for higher quality everywhere, it's easier to adopt existing, battle-tested modules eventually rather than creating modules from scratch.
Little additions are acceptable
As long as they are documented and tested well, adding little helpers to existing modules is acceptable. For two reasons:
- It makes Nim easier to learn and use in the long run. ("Why does sequtils lack a countIt? Because version 1.0 happens to have lacked it? Silly...")
- To encourage contributions. Contributors often start with PRs that add simple things and then they stay and also fix bugs. Nim is an open source project and lives from people's contributions and involvement. Newly introduced issues have to be balanced against motivating new people. We know where to find perfectly designed pieces of software that have no bugs -- these are the systems that nobody uses.
Conventions
- New stdlib modules should go under Nim/lib/std/. The rationale is to require users to import via import std/foo instead of import foo, which would cause potential conflicts with nimble packages. Note that this still applies for new modules in existing logical directories, e.g.: use lib/std/collections/foo.nim, not lib/pure/collections/foo.nim.
- New module names should prefer plural form whenever possible, e.g.: std/sums.nim instead of std/sum.nim. In particular, this reduces chances of conflicts between module name and the symbols it defines. Furthermore, module names should use snake_case and not use capital letters, which cause issues when going from an OS without case sensitivity to an OS with it.
Breaking Changes
Introducing breaking changes, no matter how well intentioned, creates long-term problems for the community, in particular those looking to promote reusable Nim code in libraries: In the Nim distribution, critical security and bugfixes, language changes and community improvements are bundled in a single distribution - it is difficult to make partial upgrades with only benign changes. When one library depends on a legacy behavior, it can no longer be used together with another library that does not, breaking all downstream applications - the standard library is unique in that it sits at the root of all dependency trees.
There is a big difference between compile-time breaking changes and run-time breaking changes.
Run-time breaking changes
Run-time breaking changes are to be avoided at almost all costs: Nim is used for mission critical applications which depend on behaviours that are not covered by the test suite. As such, it's important that changes to the stable parts of the standard library are made avoiding changing the existing behaviors, even when the test suite continues to pass.
Examples of run-time breaking changes:
- Raising exceptions of a new type, compared to what's currently being raised.
- Adding unconstrained or poorly constrained generic procs or macros ("hash now works for all ref T"): This may cause code to behave differently depending only on which modules are imported - common examples include == and hash.
- Changing behavior of existing functions like:
- "Nim's path handling procs like getXDir now consistently lack the trailing slash"
- "Nim's strformat implementation is now more consistent with Python"
Instead write new code that explicitly announces the feature you think we announced but didn't. For example, strformat does not say "it's compatible with Python", it says "inspired by Python's f-strings". This new code can be submitted to the stdlib and the old code can be deprecated or it can be published as a Nimble package.
Sometimes, a run-time breaking change is most desirable: For example, a string representation of a floating point number that "roundtrips" is much better than a string represenation that doesn't. These run-time breaking changes must start in the state "opt-in" via a new -d:nimPreviewX or command line flag and then should become the new default later, in follow-up versions. This way users can track regressions more easily. ("git bisect" is not an acceptable alternative, that's for Nim compiler developers, not for Nim users.)
Above all else, additive approaches that don't change existing behaviors should be preferred.
Compile-time breaking changes
Compile-time breaking changes are usually easier to handle, but for large code bases it can also be much work and it can hinder the adoption of a new Nim release. Additive approaches are to be preferred here as well.
Examples of compile-time breaking changes include (but are not limited to):
- Renaming functions and modules, or moving things. Instead of a direct rename, deprecate the old name and introduce a new one.
- Renaming the parameter names: Thanks to Nim's "named parameter" calling syntax like f(x = 0, y = 1) this is a breaking change. Instead live with the existing parameter names.
- Adding an enum value to an existing enum. Nim's exhaustive case statements stop compiling after such a change. Instead consider to introduce new bool fields/parameters. This can be impractical though, so we use good judgement and our list of "important packages" to see if it doesn't break too much code out there in practice.
- Adding a new proc to an existing stdlib module. However, for aesthetic reasons this is often preferred over introducing a new module with just a single proc inside. We use good judgement and our list of "important packages" to see if it doesn't break too much code out there in practice. The new procs need to be annotated with a .since annotation.
Compiler/language spec bugfixes
This can even be applied to compiler "bugfixes": If the compiler should have been "pickier" in its handling of typedesc, instead of "fixing typedesc handling bugs", consider the following solution:
- Spec out how typedesc should really work and also spec out the cases where it should not be allowed!
- Deprecate typedesc and name the new metatype something new like typeArg.
- Implement the spec.
Non-breaking changes
Examples of changes that are considered non-breaking (or acceptable breaking changes) include:
- Creating a new module.
- Adding an overload to an already overloaded proc.
- Adding new default parameters to an existing proc. It is assumed that you do not use Nim's stdlib procs's addresses (that you don't use them as first class entities).
- Changing the calling convention from nimcall to inline (but first RFC https://github.com/nim-lang/RFCs/issues/396 needs to be implemented).
- Changing the behavior from "crashing" into some other, well documented result (including raising a Defect, but not raising an exception that does not inherit from Defect).
- Adding new fields to an existing object.
Nim's introspection facilities imply that strictly speaking almost every addition can break somebody's code. It is impractical to care about these cases, a change that only affects introspection is not considered to be a breaking change.